fbpx
skip to Main Content

Aggiornamento Appendix Endometriosis

del 26-02-2013

J Obstet Gynaecol Can. 2013 Jan;35(1):44-8.

The role of appendectomy in gynaecologic surgery: a canadian retrospective case series.

Jocko JA, Shenassa H, Singh SS.

Source

Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, The Ottawa Hospital, The University of Ottawa, The Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa ON.

Abstract

Objective: To review the indications for, and the associated pathology and complications of, appendectomy performed during gynaecologic surgery in a tertiary academic health sciences centre. Methods: We performed a retrospective review of appendectomy cases performed from September 2007 to December 2011 in a tertiary level gynaecologic surgical practice. Cases were reviewed using a standardized intake sheet with surgical reports, history, and pathologic findings. Results: A total of 71 appendectomies were performed during gynaecologic surgery in the study period. All cases were primary gynaecologic surgical cases; the most common diagnoses were endometriosis, pelvic pain, and pelvic mass. Overall, 42 (59%) of the study cases had abnormal histopathology in the appendix. Of the 44 women with a primary diagnosis of endometriosis, 28 (64%) had positive appendiceal pathology. In women with chronic pelvic pain, three of eight (38%) had pathology within their appendix. Of all appendixes removed that appeared normal on gross inspection, irrespective of diagnosis, 44% had positive pathology. Conclusion: When a structured approach is taken towards assessment of the appendix during gynaecologic surgical cases, with removal when indicated, a high rate of pathology may be found. In this series, there were no complications directly related to the appendectomy, providing support for the contention that appropriately trained gynaecologists can safely perform appendectomy. The findings in this Canadian series are in keeping with previous reports and support the need for evaluation and removal of the appendix when indicated at the time of gynaecological surgery.

Am J Obstet Gynecol. 2013 Jan;208(1):e12-4. doi: 10.1016/j.ajog.2012.10.001. Epub 2012 Oct 4.

A rare case of primary extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, and appendix in the setting of endometriosis.

Nezhat CH, Dun EC, Wieser F, Zapata M.

Source

Atlanta Center for Minimally Invasive Surgery and Reproductive Medicine, Northside Hospital, Atlanta, GA, USA.

Abstract

Extranodal marginal zone B-cell lymphomas are uncommon. Most occur in the gastrointestinal tract. Marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of the female genital tract are rare, and few cases exist of marginal zone B-cell lymphomas of the uterus, cervix, and fallopian tubes. We report the first marginal zone B-cell lymphoma of the ovary, fallopian tube, and appendix arising in endometriosis.

Lancet. 2012 Sep 29;380(9848):1202. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(12)60819-8.

Appendiceal intussusception caused by endometriosis.

Mehmood S, Phair A, Sahely S, Ong A, Law A, Onwudike M, Ferguson G.

Source

Department of General Surgery, Royal Bolton Hospital, Bolton NHS Foundation Trust, Bolton, UK. drsajidm@hotmail.com

J Med Case Rep. 2012 Sep 26;6(1):327. doi: 10.1186/1752-1947-6-327.

Chronic abdominal pain, appendiceal mucinous neoplasm, and concurrent intestinal endometriosis: a case report.

Kurogochi T, Fujita T, Iida N, Etoh K, Ogawa M, Yanaga K.

Source

Department of Surgery, The Jikei University School of Medicine, 3-25-8 Nishi-shinbashi, Minato-ku, Tokyo, Japan. ms03kurogochi@jikei.ac.jp.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION:

Although both appendiceal tumor and intestinal endometriosis have been reported as rare causes of abdominal pain, the coexistence of appendiceal mucinous neoplasm and ileal endometriosis has not previously been reported.

CASE PRESENTATION:

A 41-year-old Japanese woman presented with a positive fecal occult blood test and a 3-year history of menstruation-related lower abdominal pain. A colonoscopy demonstrated extrinsic compression of the cecum, suggesting a mass arising from the appendix or adjacent structures. Abdominal imaging showed a 6-cm cystic mass with intraluminal thick fluids originating from the appendix. At ileocecal resection for an appendiceal tumor, a 2-cm mass in the terminal ileum was incidentally found, which was included in the surgical specimen. Microscopic examination confirmed a diagnosis of a mucinous neoplasm of the appendix with endometriosis of the terminal ileum.

CONCLUSIONS:

To avoid urgent surgery for subsequent serious events associated with disease progression, appendiceal tumor and intestinal endometriosis should be ruled out in patients with chronic abdominal pain.

ANZ J Surg. 2012 Nov;82(11):844-7. doi: 10.1111/j.1445-2197.2012.06185.x. Epub 2012 Aug 24.

Pathologies of the appendix: a 10-year review of 4670 appendicectomy specimens.

Chandrasegaram MD, Rothwell LA, An EI, Miller RJ.

Source

Royal Adelaide Hospital, Adelaide, South Australia, Australia. manjudashini@yahoo.com

Abstract

BACKGROUND:

Debate surrounds the management of the macroscopically normal appendix. Current literature recommends its removal given the high incidence of microscopic appendicitis, and other unusual pathologies in the normal-looking appendix. Negative appendicectomies are reported on the decline with increased use of diagnostic radiological adjuncts.

METHODS:

This study analysed pathologies of the appendix over 10 years in the Pathology Department in Canberra. A positive appendicectomy was defined as acute appendicitis, faecoliths, worms, endometriosis or appendiceal tumours. We reviewed the positive appendicectomy rate over this time period.

RESULTS:

There were 4670 appendicectomy specimens in 2386 males (51.1%) and 2284 (49%) females. The incidence of acute appendicitis was 71.3% and the positive appendicectomy rate was 76.3%. There were significantly fewer negative appendicectomies in males (16.8%) compared with females (31.0%). There was no appreciable change in this trend over the study period. Of the positive appendicectomies, there were 129 (3.6%) faecoliths. Of these, only 39.5% had concomitant appendicitis. There were 44 (1.2%) specimens identified with worms. Of these, 40.9% had concomitant appendicitis. There were 14 cases of endometriosis of the appendix of which 36% had concomitant appendicitis. There were 58/3562 (1.6%) appendiceal tumours within the positive appendicectomy group the majority of which were carcinoid tumours (65.5%).

CONCLUSION:

There is a higher incidence of negative appendicectomies in women compared with men, which is similar to other published studies. Faecoliths and worms are a known cause of appendiceal colic and in our series were identified mostly in the absence of histological evidence of appendicitis.

Rev Bras Ginecol Obstet. 2012 Jun;34(6):278-84.

Deep infiltrating endometriosis: anatomical distribution and surgical treatment.

[Article in Portuguese]

Kondo W, Ribeiro R, Trippia C, Zomer MT.

Source

Hospital Vita Batel e Centro Médico-Hospitalar Sugisawa – Curitiba (PR), Brasil.

Abstract

PURPOSE:

To evaluate the anatomical distribution of deep infiltrating endometriosis (DIE) lesions in a sample of women from the South of Brazil.

METHODS:

A prospective study was conducted on women undergoing surgical treatment for DIE from January 2010 to January 2012. The lesions were classified according to eight main locations, from least serious to worst: round ligament, anterior uterine serosa/vesicouterine peitoneal reflection, utero-sacral ligament, retrocervical area, vagina, bladder, intestine, ureter. The number and location of the DIE lesions were studied for each patient according to the above-mentioned criteria and also according to uni- or multifocality. The statistical analysis was performed using Statistica version 8.0. The values p<0.05 were considered statistically significant.

RESULTS:

During the study period, a total of 143 women presented 577 DIE lesions: uterosacral ligament (n=239; 41.4%), retrocervical (n=91; 15.7%), vagina (n=50; 8.7%), round ligament (n=50; 8,7%), vesico-uterine septum (n=41; 7.1%), bladder (n=12; 2.1%), and intestine (n=83; 14.4%), ureter (n=11; 1.9%). Multifocal disease was observed in the majority of patients (p<0.0001), and the mean number of DIE lesions per patient was 4. Ovarian endometrioma was present in 57 women (39.9%). Sixty-five patients (45.4%) presented intestinal infiltration on histological examination. A total of 83 DIE intestinal lesions were distributed as follows: appendix (n=7), cecum (n=1) and rectosigmoid (n=75). The mean number of intestinal lesions per patient was 1.3.

CONCLUSIONS:

DIE has a multifocal pattern of distribution, a fact of fundamental importance for the definition of the complete surgical treatment of the disease.

Questo articolo ha 0 commenti

Lascia un commento

Iscriviti alla newsletter

Consigli e indicazioni per vivere in modo sano l'endometriosi.

Back To Top
Cerca